steve@klubermade.com

Content Strategy Simplified

Taking Proactive Steps to Pollution Control During Consolidation in the Paint Industry
Home » Portfolio » Industrial Manufacturer: Paint Pollution Control Campaign  » Taking Proactive Steps to Pollution Control During Consolidation in the Paint Industry

Client: The CMM Group

The paint industry has continued to become more and more centralized. With no more than a few hundred players globally, the power is becoming centralized at the top—and according to the Wall Street Journal, more consolidation may be on the horizon. With industry consolidation comes intense focus by regulators, investors, and members of the press, creating an environment where one slip-up could become a PR or investor nightmare. Today, we would like to explore the current state of consolidation in coatings, and discuss why it pays to be proactive in your pollution control activities.

A History of Consolidation in the Paint Industry

In 1969, there were more than 1,100 paint manufacturers in the United States, each meeting the needs of local markets and operating relatively unregulated. Over time, these entities folded, merged, or were acquired.

The EPA, Clean Air Act, and Stagflation Pushes Consolidation

Throughout the 1970s, an increasingly strict regulatory environment combined with economic pressures, material shortages, and reporting challenges that made it hard to be a local or regional player in the paint market. Smaller companies were routinely challenged by suppliers who, facing market pressures of their own, had to implement price at shipment pricing, which drove costs highest for small manufacturers.

These costs were more easily absorbed by larger manufacturers who could use leverage to make purchasing easier, whose formula changes affect hundreds of thousands of gallons, and whose cost of reporting could be spread across these massive outputs.

Over the past five decades, the number of paint manufacturers has whittled down to a couple hundred globally, led by 10 key players.

Today’s Paint Industry Landscape: Global Efficiency and Additional Calls for Regulation

Today, the market for consolidation is once again heating up, drawing a lot of interest from the press and others. Last month, a Wall Street Journal article looked at some of the targets for acquisition, discussing Nippon Paint’s bid for Axalta Coating Systems to counter a bid from Akzo Nobel, who is consequently being targeted by PPG Industries in a bid to become the largest global paint manufacturer.

Consolidation Creates Excitement, Excitement Creates Press

As you can see, consolidation is nothing new, but often, consolidation brings additional attention from not only industry insiders, but from regulators, members of the press, and watchdogs. Take a look at healthcare, an industry that’s rife with disruption and M&A activity. Do you think that outsiders will give CVS a little more attention during and after their acquisition of Aetna?

The same goes for the paint industry. There’s money to be made in breaking a story, and a relatively innocuous violation of an EPA regulation could go from “EPA Press Release” to the front page of every newspaper, environmental blog, and class action lawyer’s website. Additionally, in today’s hyperpartisan environmental reporting world, EPA/CAA noncompliance by an industry giant could easily be spun into a PR nightmare on par with the DuPont chemical leak.

Why Paint Manufacturers Need to Be Proactive Regarding Pollution Control

With the press that will come about as a result of increased consolidation in the paint industry, it pays to ensure that appropriate pollution control measures are taken now to prevent the potential PR nightmare that could take place during or after a merger.

Knowing this, the last time that many paint manufacturers have thought hard about their VOC abatement solution was either the last time their oxidizer needed maintenance, or worse, the last effective date of the Clean Air Amendments. Too often, companies install an oxidizer and think “that’s all.” Unfortunately, as VOC Abatement technology ages, it becomes less and less efficient, while becoming more likely to experience costly, business-disrupting downtime. If your VOC abatement solution is pushing or has exceeded 20 or even 30 years of existence, it’s not only inefficient (costly) by today’s standards, it’s risky to your reputation, your compliance efforts, and the environment.